Political Ideology - More like YOUR FACE is a political ideology, AM I RIGHT LADS

Originally created by uugr
2 months ago.

1 Adherents

on 1 Root

4 Comments

Macheman7
0

Notice: Undefined index: FID in /home4/yalort/public_html/charcoal/code/common.php on line 11
Macheman7 19 United States SanguineMelancholic INFJ 4w5 289C
Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmnnnnnnnnnnnnno.
No you're not. O_o
uugr
0

Notice: Undefined index: FID in /home4/yalort/public_html/charcoal/code/common.php on line 11
uugr 15 United States MelancholicSanguine INFJ 276C
Hmm. You provide an interesting argument, but I'm afraid I have to disagree with you on some pretty major details.

For one, you seem to have 16 'm's and 13 'n's, followed by a scant one 'o'. I find this completely unacceptable, as I feel very strongly about equal opportunities for all letters of the alphabet. The fact that you seem to think an 'n' is only 81.25% the worth of an 'm' is something I don't think I can accept without justification. To prove your extensive claims, please give me 16 situations involving the letters 'm' or 'n', in which the letter 'm' is a superior option in exactly 13 of them.

Moving on to your next sentence, I find some ambiguity. You suggest that I am 'not', which seems to be responding to my political ideology, but you don't get any more specific than that. Are you suggesting I *don't* believe in the political ideology of 'More like YOUR FACE is a political ideology, AM I RIGHT LADS'? Why would you think that? Perhaps I should look at it from a different angle... maybe you're somehow trying to dismiss the system itself? But then, in what way? Are you saying my/your face *isn't* a political ideology, or that I am not right?? If the latter, am I not right in general or am I not right when specificially referring to the Lads? Regardless of which of these is correct (or maybe there's another option I didn't consider!), you refuse to provide any evidence for your statement. I must insist that you think more before you post. This site matters, you know.

And we move to the end of your post. 'O_o'. Now, I know that this part is a bit subjective, so you may disagree with me, but frankly, I think it's of supreme, undeniable importance that the larger eye must be the one on the *right*, rather than the left. Like this: o_O. There are a number of reasons for this, and I won't bore you with all of them, but the most major one is probably the gradual build-up that is felt more with o_O than O_o. Reading left-to-right, you see the smaller eye first, so you may assume a benign o_o, before having your expectations dashed by a surprising and powerful o_O! The same is not true of the reverse, as O_O and O_o are essentially at the same level of impact.

Of course, if you have any particular reason to prefer O_o, feel free to share it. I'm open to an alternate possibility, I've just never heard an argument for one.

I'm not sure if I get the point of your post, though. It sounds like you're dissing my all-important opinions on politics, which would be inexcusable, but I don't want to jump to conclusions. Please clarify! This is important!
Macheman7
0

Notice: Undefined index: FID in /home4/yalort/public_html/charcoal/code/common.php on line 11
Macheman7 19 United States SanguineMelancholic INFJ 4w5 289C
Your argument is invalid due to the fact that I used six 'o's; One in the 'Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmnnnnnnnnnnnnno', one in the 'no', one in the 'you're', one in the 'not', and an astonishing TWO in my supreme statement 'O_o'. Also, your argument is invalid because you look like a monkey. >:{
uugr
0

Notice: Undefined index: FID in /home4/yalort/public_html/charcoal/code/common.php on line 11
uugr 15 United States MelancholicSanguine INFJ 276C
The point still stands, though. 6 < 13 < 16, so the 'o' is still, from your perspective, the - eugh - 'inferior' letter. Which is really a disgusting position.

Anyway, you smell bad. So there.